| You
are in Activism / Government
on drugs UKCIA
letter in reponse to Strategy Unit drug report In
July 2005 a report by
the Prime Minister's Strategy
Unit was leaked to the press,
containing facts, figures and an analysis of the effectiveness of the Government's
current strategy on illegal drugs - which currently is prohibition. It does not
paint a good picture of either the efforts to combat 'drug abuse' so far, or the
even the validity of its goals, and puts the Government under suspicion of a cover-up
with regard to the results of their drug strategy. When
the Freedom of Information legislation was used to get a copy of the report, only
half
of it was released, with the rest presumably deemed to be prejudicial to the
operations society in some way. An examination of the full report shows that this
is a ludicrous claim. Much of the information witheld is already available elsewhere
and some is just common sense. The only thing this report undermines is the Government's
already lame attempts at maintaining the credibility persuing prohibition based
policies. The
report, written in 2003, shows that the British government has been aware of the
fact that the so-called "war on drugs" that this country has been waging
at huge cost for the past 30 or so years has been a total and utter failure. In
response, UKCIA sent the following letter to Paul
Goggins MP, currently the minister with responsibility for drugs policy. We
await a response in this vital matter.
| On
the 1st of July 2005, the Prime Ministers Strategy Unit released part of
a previously confidential report on drugs, entitled SU Drugs Project Phase
1 report: Understanding the issues via its obligations under the Freedom
of Information Act. This
report appears to be a damning indictment of the current Governments policy
with regard to illegal drugs; suggesting that it is ineffective in its aims and
these aims are in themselves likely to be harmful to both users and the rest of
the UK population. The
reports conclusions included: - Over
3 million people in the UK use illegal drugs every year.
- Over
the past 30 years the rate of illegal drug use, especially hard drugs,
has risen dramatically despite the continuing war on drugs Governmental
policies of prohibition.
- Heroin
and crack users commit £16bn worth of crime a year to feed their habits.
The total cost of harm arising from drug use per year is £25bn.
- Despite
intensive efforts, only up to 20% of drugs are seized. There is ample supply of
drugs as evidenced by falling costs per unit in the UK.
- Profits
for drug traffickers are high enough that seizures can be written off as a cost
of business rather than a deterrent to trade.
- For
a real effect the seizure figure would need to be more than 60%. Not only is this
seemingly impossible to achieve but it may have negative effects; namely:
- Drug
prices would go up necessitating that determined users commit higher levels of
crime to maintain their habit, as evidenced in the Australian heroin drought.
- Dealers
would decrease the purity of their product, making their usage even more unpredictable
and dangerous.
In
the two years since this information was presented to members of the Government
it seems that firstly, despite the implications for exacerbating the current levels
of harm suffered by both drug users and non-drug users, the report was subject
to a cover-up. Unlike other Strategy Unit reports, the contents were not released
to the public. During this period large amounts of tax-payers money continued,
and indeed are continuing, to be injected into what the report suggests is a useless
and dangerous policy, causing huge amounts of health, financial, and social harm.
Even when challenged under the Freedom of Information Act, the Government only
released less than half of the report. The rest was subsequently leaked to the
press, and upon reading it, it becomes apparent that there was nothing prejudicial
to security or public affairs in it. Most of the information is already available
or easy to conclude from elsewhere. The only thing that this full publication
seems to undermine is the legitimacy of the Governments aims in their current
drugs policy, and that aside, any claimed success in executing them. In a democratic
society, this information should form the basis of a consultation regarding an
urgent change of policy rather than a cover-up. With
the above in mind, in your role as the minister with responsibility for drug strategy,
I would appreciate it if you could respond on the following points and any other
of relevance: - Do
you agree that on the face of it this report shows the current policy of drug
prohibition in the UK to be ineffective and potentially harmful to society?
- Having
seen this research, does the Government intend to seriously consider radically
changing its illegal drugs policy to avoid the unworkable and dangerous consequences
the report suggests the current regime has for example a legalised, regulated
regime of controllable usage? If not, an explanation as to why would be appreciated.
- Given
the clear absence of new information that would adversely affect security or public
affairs, and the importance of its conclusions, why was the report withheld and
to this day remains officially classified?
- When
will it be officially published publicly, and will the second part Diagnosis
and Recommendations by published alongside?
| |