Re: Skunk Contamination
Posted by:
ReformedSmoker24 (IP Logged)
Date: February 06, 2008 09:34PM
Ok, I haven't posted on this forum yet, but of course like many of you I was interested to know the prevalence of this grit weed. It started several years ago, and I (in a haze of Class A drugs), like a dumbass smoked it prolifically. I only really figured it out after I'd put so much of that shit in my body that the damage was already done. I get hot flushes, itching, painful swollen lymph nodes. Basically I'm being investigated for lymphoma. I blame this on the adulterated bud. I used to be fit, and for a toker, really fit, nowadays my right lung doesn't properly inflate, I have a lesion in my throat, and persistent headaches. Basically I fucked myself up bigtime.
I can't toke anymore, not the way I used to, mostly cause I'm in Manchester and the bud is almost all adulterated. The guys I used to know who grew, have left Uni. I however do not have that luxury, (as im doin my Postgrad).
Now this is where I become all professional and all that.
ZeroGrrl- I am not the sort of type who is generally inpolite, but I do have to agree with diggin4Gems, and second his sentiment.. "That is total bollocks", seriously from where do you draw those conclusions..? Have you smoked amature weed next to high grade, and thought... "mmm, the amature weed is ok, but the ash is hard"....
You are probably thinking of damp bud aren't you? (Sorry if that was patronizing). I've smoked for 10yrs and my ash has never been hard till this 'plastic' shit (I say plastic as this is the tactile sensation interpreted in my brain, it tells me: plastic, whether it is or not). Now it would be very easy for me to rant with things like: "Im a big smoker, my best mates the biggest dealer in the world, and I invented the bong"... and other nonsensical bollocks, but I will instead, (as a Biochemist), ask you one simple thing:
Is ash the product of:
a) Complete combustion
b) Partial combustion
Then I will begin to ramble....
I can't be assed waiting for a response so i'll just tell you: Ash can be 're-lit' you just need enough energy. Now if the ash is a product of combustion then in theory it should be the uncombustable remains of the materal (skunk), this is not always the case, but science is full of assumptions.
Not everything will burn in oxygen at 1atm, the resins in skunk are a good example, they are long chain hydrocarbons and require large amounts of invested energy, but due to the increase in entropy, and their large size. In excess O2 there is still free energy (ΔG), and they burn producing heat, but only under pressure (an untoked spliff will go out). What they leave behind (Incuding smoke, which is a solid suspension with large amounts of energy and brownian motion, it is NOT A GAS ) is TAR, this is relativley incombustible at STP w/o large amounts of energy. Yet the ash is still soft and white....
So what is this hard ash? From the information above I'm sure you can draw the conclusion that if it still has molecular cohesion (its hard) less energy was expelled and therefor less smoke would have been produced. Also the composition of the "fuel" (weed) is one that will not combust readily even under pressure (a deep toke creates pressure). Leading to the conclusion that the coating of the bud is less combustible than Skunk resins... Besides, when I lived at home, I grew some Northen Lights, it was damn nice, and I'm an amateur... You said "nothing a good wash won't cure", Then what are you washing off if it's not a contaminant?? I should have just said that shouldn't I?
You know what, I have work to do. This was a fantastic distraction. I just wish security wasn't so tight, and I could get some "me" time with the mass spec, and my lab, and some willing undergraduates I paid to keep stum. Then I'd settle this once and for all... And whip up a few kg of MDMA.. he he..
Peace and Love is all well and good.... But what happens when you run out?