I posted this to the
EDP forum (The EDP is the regional paper for the Norfolk/Suffolk area). Please feel free to respond to it!
Derek
--------------------------------
In the thread "30 arrests in Norwich burglary crackdown" Keith Gerrad wrote:
keith gerrard wrote:
>>
Small scale producers have tried to fill this gap, the first results of this are that there is now a huge quantity of dangerous drugs being sold. Some has salt or modeling clay in it, some more dangerous additives.
USERS SHOULD BE VERY CAREFULL.
>>
As I've mentioned before, I help run a cannabis law reform website known as UKCIA. Since mid summer, we began hearing of a shortage of cannabis on the streets and it soon became clear that the police had been shutting down large scale gro-ops. This was months before the EDP and just about every other "news outlet" carried the police story of a crack-down incidently.
Many of these grow ops were linked to criminal networks so perhaps it wasn't a bad thing, but of course, this is a demand lead market and that shortage wasn't going to last.
We are now hearing reports of something we've never heard of before and indeed used to think was impossible. All over the UK from the West Country to Scotland we're hearing reports of herbal cannabis which is highly contaminated. It seems the plant material has been sprayed with or dipped in some kind of glue which contains a grit or sand type substance.
This can't have come from lots of small scale suppliers because it’s all the same everywhere.
I suspect what's happening is cannabis is being covered with glue containing this grit in order to increase weight. Because the police raids caused a big shortage, the price of cannabis went up making the profits also go up and these people are greedy. It's fairly typical of what prohibition does to be honest - it adds unknown dangers whilst increasing profits.
We have no idea what the glue is, but the sand seems to be fairly inert from what we've heard, although people have questioned what the effect of breathing in tiny particles of hot grit would be on the lungs. Of course, we don't know it's inert for sure.
I've contacted the Home Office drugs unit with this information asking them what the extent and nature of this contamination is, but I don't think they'll tell me simply because, of course, they don't know and have no way of knowing. Again, such is prohibition.
But Keith’s warning is correct. Drug users are now being put at an increased and unknown risk (which is in addition to any risk cannabis use as such may pose) because of the effects of the police enforcement. I know of no other law which puts consumers at a greater risk than they need be at, but prohibition certainly does and it uses this increased risk as a measure of success.
Of course, this crack down - like all the others - is reported without criticism by the press. Why is that?
Derek
Webteam UKCIA