You
are in Library
The
Second Cannabis and Mental Health conference
|
Held
in Kings College, University of London, May 1-2 2007
Conference
abstracts
The
central nervous system and endocannabinoids
Prof. Raphael Mechoulam, Israel
The
major endocannabionoid 2-arachidonoyl glycerol (2-AG) has been identified
both in the central nervous system and in the periphery. Stressful
stimuli-traumatic brain injury (TBI) for example - enhance brain
2-AG levels in mice.
2-AG,
both of endogenous and exogenous origin, has been shown to be neuroprotective
in in-vivo models of closed head injury, ischemia and excitotoxicity.
These effects may derive from the ability of cannabinoids to act
through various biochemical mechanisms including inhibition of glutamate
release or direct blockade of NMDA receptors, inhibition of intracellular
calcium mobilization, action as reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavengers,
inhibition of pro- flammatory cytokines and inhibition of NF-kB
activation. 2-AG also helps repair the blood brain barrier after
TBI.
The
endocannabinoids act via multiple receptors, of which the CB1 receptors
are most abundant in the CNS. We
have shown that CB1 knockout mice display slower functional recovery
after TBI and do not respond to treatment
with 2-AG. Recently however CB2 receptors have also been found to
be formed in the brain, particularly in various pathological states.
Arachidonoyl-L-serine
(ARA-S) is an endogenous constituent of the endocannabionoid family,
which we recently
isolated from bovine brain. ARA-S binds very weakly to the known
cannabinoid receptors. It was found to be a
vasorelaxant in an endothelium-dependent manner and to suppress
formation of reactive oxygen intermediates, NO and TNF-a in a murine
macrophage cell line, as well as TNF-a in vivo. We assume that ARA-S,
due to its vasorelaxant, anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties,
could be a candidate neuroprotective agent in our animal model.
Indeed,
a preliminary study revealed that mice, injected with ARA-S after
injury, displayed a significantly greater
recovery of the neurobehavioral function, as compared with vehicle-treated
mice. which sustained for at least 60 days. We assumed that the
endocannabionoid system may be involved in the pathogenesis of hepatic
encephalopathy, a neuropsychiatric syndrome induced by fulminant
hepatic failure. Indeed in an animal model we found that the levels
of 2-AG are elevated and administration of 2-AG improved a neurological
score, activity and cognitive function. Apparently here 2-AG acts
via the CB2 receptor as a specific CB2 receptor agonist had the
same effect, while CB1 agonists were inactive.
-----------------------------
Endocannabinoids
and development
Dr
Patrick Doherty. UK
The
active components of cannabis function by stimulating the CB1 cannabinoid
receptor in the brain. These receptors have normal functions, and
the brain makes its own molecules (called endocannabinoids) to activate
them. Diacylglycerol lipase (DAGL) activity generates 2-arachidonyl
glycerol (2-AG), the most abundant endocannabinoid in the nervous
system. Insights into novel roles for endocannabinoids during development,
and in the adult, are emerging based on a full understanding of
where and when the DAGLs are expressed. The enzymes are first expressed
by newly differentiated neurons, supporting an important role for
the enzymes in axonal growth and guidance. The enzymes become restricted
to post-synaptic sites at all CB1 positive synapses in the adult
nervous system where they are well placed to synthesize, on demand,
an endocannabinoid for the retrograde control of synaptic strength
and neuroprotection. The enzymes are also expressed by neural stem
cells in the adult brain where they play a role in the generation
of new neurons throughout life. The cloning and characterisation
of these enzymes paves the way for a better understanding of the
factors that regulate endocannabinoid signalling, a pathway that
can now be viewed as having multiple functions throughout the developing
and adult brain.
-----------------------------
Cannabis,
cognition and schizophrenia
Dr Nadia Sofowij, Australia
Long-term, heavy cannabis use is associated with specific cognitive
impairments, similar to the cognitive endophenotypes proposed as
vulnerability markers of schizophrenia. The endogenous cannabinoid
system is involved in memory, attention and other cognitive functions,
expresses altered functionality following exposure to cannabis,
and is implicated in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. This
presentation will provide an overview of what is known about the
long term cognitive effects of cannabis in the general population
and present new research on cognition and brain structure and function
in cannabis users and in people with schizophrenia who also use
cannabis.
-----------------------------
A
functional MRI study of the effects of cannabis on the brain
Prof. Philip McGuire, UK
Cannabis
use can induce psychotic symptoms and anxiety and can alter cognitive
and emotional processing. We used functional neuroimaging to investigate
the neurocognitive basis of these effects, using experimental tasks
that engage processes known to be modulated by cannabis use.
Methods
Subjects
were 15 healthy males who were not regular cannabis users. Each
subject was studied on 3 occasions,
and was given either THC, CBD or placebo 1 hour prior to scanning,
in a double-blind design. The order of drug
administration was randomised and there was 1 month between each
scanning session. During each session, images were acquired on a
1.5T GE camera while subjects performed a verbal paired associates
memory task, a Go/ No Go task, visual processing of anxious faces
and listening to speech. The modulatory effects of THC and CBD relative
to placebo were examined by comparing activation during each task.
Results
During
the encoding phase of the memory task THC attenuated activation
in the left temporal cortex compared to
placebo. During the go-no go task, THC attenuated activation in
the right inferior frontal cortex and its effect in
this region predicted the severity of psychotic symptoms induced
by THC. THC attenuated activation in the auditory cortex while subjects
listened to speech. CBD attenuated activation in the amygdala in
response to fearful faces and this effect was correlated with the
effect of CBD on skin conductance.
Conclusions
The
different symptomatic and cognitive effects of cannabis can be related
to the influence of THC and CBD on
specific brain regions.
-----------------------------
Cannabis
exposure and the developing brain: long-term gateway effects?
Prof. Yasmin L Hurd. USA
Marijuana (Cannabis sativa) is the illicit drug most commonly used
by teenagers.
Epidemiological
studies suggest that early regular use of cannabis increases the
risk of initiating the use of other illicit drugs. Whether there
is a causal relationship between early cannabis exposure and the
progression to the use of other illicit drugs is still highly debated.
One strategy to directly evaluate the neurobiological relationship
of prior cannabis experience with other illicit drugs independent
of cultural and social factors is the use of experimental animal
models. The presentation will provide results from animal models
showing long-term cannabis-induced disturbances of reward neural
systems.
-----------------------------
Cannabis
use: an important risk factor for psychosis?
Dr. Robert Ferdinand, Netherlands
This
presentation is based on findings from an epidemiological study
among 2,076 children and adolescents from the general population
who were followed up into adulthood. In young adulthood, information
on lifetime cannabis (and other illicit drug) use and lifetime psychotic
features was obtained. At previous assessments behavioural and emotional
problems were assessed. Cannabis use predicted future psychotic
symptoms. However, the reverse, psychotic symptoms predicting cannabis
use, was also found. The prediction of psychotic symptoms by cannabis
use could not be explained by high levels of behavioural or emotional
problems in general. Remarkably, MDMA use predicted psychotic symptoms
as well. Implications for mental health policies will be discussed.
-----------------------------
Cannabis
an dpsychotic symptoms, is htere a causal link?
Prof. David M Fergusson, New Zealand
This
presentation will use data from the Christchurch Health & Development
Study (CHDS) to examine the linkages between exposure to cannabis
use and rates of psychosis/psychotic symptoms. The CHDS is a longitudinal
study of a birth cohort of 1,265 children born in 1977 that has
been studied to the age of 30. Key issues to be examined include:
confounding; reverse causality; and the pathways linking cannabis
use to the development of psychotic symptoms. The implications of
these findings for the regulation of cannabis use and supply will
be considerable.
-----------------------------
Genetic
moderation of cannabis-induced psychosis
Dr Cecile Henquet, Netherlands
Observational
studies have shown that gene X environment interactions may underlie
the association between cannabis use and psychosis. A double-blind
placebo controlled study in which patients with a psychotic illness,
relatives of patients and healthy controls were exposed to delta-9-THC,
showed that a functional polymorphism in the cathechol-0-methyltransferase
gene moderates the acute effects of cannabis on cognition and psychosis
outcome. A momentary assessment technique was furthermore used to
assess differences between patients and controls in the effects
of cannabis in daily life. These data show that psychosis liability
is associated with differential sensitivity to both the psychosis-inducing
and mood-enhancing effects of cannabis. The temporal dissociation
between acute rewarding effects and sub-acute psychotogenic effects
may be instrumental in explaining the circle of deleterious use
in patients with psychotic illness.
-----------------------------
Use
of cannabis in a East-London first episode psychosis sample: data
from the GAP, genetics and psychosis study
Dr Marta Di Forti, UK
Background:
Exposure to cannabis is associated with a risk of developing psychosis.
Individual sceptibility depends on age of onset of cannabis abuse
and on genotype (Arseneault et al., 2004; Caspi et al., 2005). In
the general population cannabis use is associated with lower educational
achievement (Macleod et al, 2004). There are not study addressing
this association in individuals with psychosis. In this study we
investigate whether early age at first cannabis use is associated
with longer and regular use and whether cannabis use predicts level
of educational achievement in a first-episode psychotic population.
Method:
We
collected demographic, clinical and cannabis use (age at first use,
frequency, length of use) information
in a sample of 200 first-episode psychosis patients. All the subjects
were recruited as part of the Genetic And
sychosis (GAP) study.
Results:
110
(55%) smoked cannabis, eighty-nine were male and 21 female. We collected
data on age at first use on
sventy subjects, of whom 44 (62,8%) began their use before age 16.
The mean age at first use of cannabis was 16,24 years. The mean
age of onset of psychosis in the cannabis users group was 2 years
earlier (mean 23,2; SD 4,575) than in the non cannabis users group
(mean 25,3; SD 7,004), p= 0.014. However there was not significant
difference in age of onset between genders.
Among
those who commenced cannabis use before age 16, the mean length
of cannabis use was 9,5 years
compared to 5,4 years among those whose use began after 17 years.
We had data on frequency of cannabis use
on sixty-three subjects. Forty-one began their use before age 16,
and of these 33 (70,2%) used cannabis three or
more times a week compared to the 14 (29,8%) of those who started
after 16 years. Applying a multiple regression, we found that age
at first use predicted years of cannabis use (p=0,008) independent
of age of onset of psychosis and showed a trend towards significance
for frequency of cannabis use (p=0,07). We had available data on
level of education achieved on 81 patients, 55 (67.9%) male and
26 female (32.1%), mean age: 31.0yrs, range 19-59yrs (SD: 7.7).
Of these 81 cases 54 (66.7%) were cannabis users, with mean age
of 29.2 y (SD 5.9) and 27 cases (33.3%) were not cannabis users,
mean age 34.7 y (SD 9.5). Applying linear regression analysis using
level of education as the dependant variable and frequency of use
as the independent variable we found that frequency of cannabis
use predicts level of education achieved (p=0.03).
Condusion:
Early
age at first use of cannabis is associated with longer and regular
use in patients with their first episode of psychosis. Counterintuitively,
our data also show that frequent cannabis use is associated with
higher academic achievement in a first episode psychotic population.
This is not due to the non-users being of lower age. Further analyses
will be conducted to explore this interesting finding.
-----------------------------
Day
2
Interventions
for cannabis use disorder: an overview
Prof. Jan Copeland, Australia
Cannabis
is the most widely used illicit substance in the Western world with
more than one in four young people in the UK having ever used it.
Worldwide, its use is increasingly recognised as a source of morbidity,
with recent concerns focusing on its contribution to psychosis in
young people. In 1996 it was estimated in Australia, that more disability-adjusted
healthy years of life were lost due to cannabis use and dependence
than to HIV, Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C combined. In addition,
there is a growing demand for cannabis dependence treatment locally
and internationally. This paper will provide an overview of the
evidence to support psycho-social interventions for cannabis use
disorder and discuss the promising pharmacotherapies, and specific
interventions for co-occurring cannabis dependence and other psychological
disorders, currently under investigation internationally.
-----------------------------
Stoned,
cold sober: psychological interventions for cannabis and alcohol
use among people with psychosis
or major depression
Dr Amanda Baker, Australia
Co-existing cannabis, alcohol and other drug problems among people
with psychosis or major
depression are very common in clinical practice. Screening, assessing
and intervening with co-existing problems is
core business for mental health, drug and alcohol and other clinicians.
As people with co-existing problems have
usually been excluded from research trials, as yet there are no
clear indications for 'best treatment'. This presentation reviews
the small but growing evidence base for psychological interventions
for cannabis and alcohol use problems among people with co-existing
psychosis or major depression. Several randomised controlled trials
conducted at the Centre for Brain and Mental Health Research, University
of Newcastle, NSW, are reviewed in detail. The growing research
base suggest that: (i) minimal interventions in the form of assessment,
the provision of self-help materials and regular follow-up; (ii)
brief motivational interventions; and (iii) cognitive behaviour
therapy are useful for people with co-existing problems, with some
evidence of differential effectiveness for alcohol versus cannabis
use problems. The high prevalence of co-existing problems and evidence
for the utility of briefer interventions for some people implies
that a 'stepped' model of care may be useful.
-----------------------------
Psychotherapeutic
interventions for cannabis abuse and/or dependence in outpatient
settings
Dr. Cecile Denis, France
Cecile Denis, Marc Auriacombe
"Addiction Psychiatry, JE2358, INSERM IFR 99, University Victor
Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux, France."
Cannabis
use disorder is the most commonly occurring illicit substance use
disorder in the general population.
Despite the large number of cannabis users who seek or may need
treatment only a few randomized clinical trials
exist that explore the most effective interventions. The six studies
included in this review show that cannabis
dependence is not easily treated by psychotherapies in outpatient
settings. Cognitive-behavioral (CB) both in
individual or group sessions, motivational enhancement in individual
sessions have been demonstrated to be
effective to reduce cannabis use. The most recent, best quality
and largest controlled trial, found extended individul
CBT to be more effective than brief individual motivational therapy.
The two studies on contingency-management
treatments concluded that this may enhance outcomes combined with
CBT or motivational enhancement.
-----------------------------
Personality
and Cannabis use
Dr. Emma Barkus, UK
Cannabis use has become almost endemic in youth culture. The identification
of personality traits which precipitate
or maintain cannabis use have been identified in clinical samples.
This approach may also be useful to highlight
risk of psychopathology or difficulties from substance use in non-clinical
samples. In particular there is a continuing
debate surrounding whether there is a causal or association relationship
between cannabis use and psychosis. The
presentation will highlight literature concerned with personality
traits and cannabis use. Emphasis will be placed on
using response to cannabis as a possibility for identifying underlying
proneness to psychiatric disease.
-----------------------------
CBD
vs. THC: imaging differences
Dr Zerrin Atakan UK
This brief presentation will elicit and discuss the findings of
a recently carried out fMRI study comparing the effects
of two major cannabis compounds, namely delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol
(THC) and cannabidiol (CBD). The subjects were 15 male, healthy
volunteers aged 20 - 42 years who had used cannabis less than 15
times in their lifetime. The compounds were also compared with placebo,
using a randomised, double blind methodology. The effects of these
two compounds on brain activation were studied when certain functions
such as motor response inhibition, verbal memory and sensory tasks
were carried out by the subjects. This is the first study showing
how these two compounds differ in the way they activate different
brain regions when the these tasks are carried out. The findings
permit the integration of previous knowledge about the effects of
cannabinoids at the level of neuroreceptors and at the behavioural
level.
-----------------------------
he
effects of delta-9-THC in healthy individuals and individuals with
schizophrenia
Dr Deepak Cyril D'Souza, USA
Laboratory studies with delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (A-9-THC) have
been a useful approach to investigate the association between cannabis
and psychosis. We have characterized the behavioural, cognitive
and endocrine effects of 0. 2.5 mg and 5 mg A-9-THC in a 3 day,
double-blind, randomized and counterbalanced study, in healthy individuals
who had been exposed to cannabis but had never been diagnosed with
a cannabis abuse disorder. A-9-THC produced schizophrenia-like positive
and negative symptoms, altered perception,
increased anxiety, produced euphoria, disrupted immediate and delayed
word recall, impaired performance on tests of attention and working
memory without impairing orientation. Interestingly, frequent users
of cannabis appear to have blunted responses to some of the "negative"
but not positive effects of A-9-THC. In a parallel study of identical
design, we characterized the effects of A-9-THC in stable, anti
psychotic-treated schizophrenia patients. A-9-THC transiently increased
learning and recall deficits, positive, negative and general schizophrenia
symptoms, perceptual alterations, akathisia, rigidity and dyskinesia,
and deficits in vigilance. Schizophrenia patients were more vulnerable
to A-9-THC effects on recall relative to controls suggesting that
CB-1R dysfunction contributes to the pathophysiology of the cognitive
deficits associated with schizophrenia.
In
light of the growing preclinical evidence of cannabinoid-dopamine
interactions, we then sought to determine
whether dopamine neurotransmission contributed to the psychotomimetic
effects of A-9-THC. We studied the effects of pretreatment with
haloperidol the dopamine receptor antagonist, on the behavioural
and cognitive effects of the cannabinoid A-9-THC in humans. Interestingly,
haloperidol did not reduce the psychotomimetic effects of A-9-THC.
Rather, haloperidol and A-9-THC interacted to worsen verbal recall
and several aspects of sustained attention.
These
data provide the first evidence in humans that we are aware of that
cannabinoid and dopamine systems have
interactive effects on attention and memory.
-----------------------------
Cannabidiol
as an antipsychotic - new perspectives
Prof. Markus Leweke, Germany
Background:
The human endocannabinoid system interacts with various neurotransmitter
systems and the endocannabinoid anandamide was found significantly
elevated in CSF and inversely correlated to psychopathology (Giuffrida
et al. 2004) providing a link to the neurobiology of schizophrenia.
While delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol, the psychoactive compound of
Cannabis sativa shows psychedelic properties, the major herbal cannabinoid
compound cannabidiol was suggested recently a re- uptake inhibitor
of anandamide. In addition potential antipsychotic properties have
been hypothezised.
Methods.
We
performed an explorative, 4-week, double-blind, controlled clinical
trial on the effects of purified cannabidiol in acute schizophrenia
compared to the antipsychotic amisulpride. The antipsychotic properties
of bothwere the primary target of the study. Furthermore side effects
and anxiolytic capabilities of both treatments were investigated.
Results:
42
patients fulfilling DSM-IV criteria of acute paranoid schizophrenia
or schizophreniform psychosis participated in the study. Both treatments
were associated with a significant decrease of psychotic symptoms
after
2 and 4 weeks as assessed by BPRS and PANSS. However, there was
no statistical difference between both treatment groups. In contrast,
cannabidiol induced significantly less side effects (EPS. increase
in prolactin, weight gain) when compared to amisulpride.
Conclusions:
Cannabidiol
proved substantial antipsychotic properties in acute schizophrenia.
This is in line with our suggestion of an adaptive role of the endocannabinoid
system in paranoid schizophrenia, and raises further evidence that
this adaptive mechanism may represent a valuable target for antipsychotic
treatment strategies.
|

Page
designed and maintained by UKCIA
|
|