You
are in Research
One Year After Release of NIH Report, Clinton Administration Still Thwarts Medicinal
Marijuana Research Marijuana
Policy Project, 07 Aug 1998
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- The Clinton administration is still stalling a full year after
the National Institutes of Health (NIH) expert group recommended policy changes
that would have expedited medicinal marijuana research, charged the Marijuana
Policy Project, an advocacy group based in Washington, D.C. "The
Clinton administration will be hard-pressed to oppose the medicinal marijuana
voter initiatives in six states this November," said Chuck Thomas, director of
communications for the Marijuana Policy Project. "When the drug czar and others
say that there should first be more research, the voters will say `sorry, you
had your chance.'"
On August 8, 1997, the NIH Ad Hoc Group of Experts released a report on its "Workshop
on the Medical Utility of Marijuana," which was conducted on February 19 and 20,
1997. *The report urged the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) to make it
easier for researchers to obtain NIDA's supply of marijuana.*
NIDA has a monopoly on the legal supply of marijuana for research in the United
States. Before scientists can study marijuana's medical benefits, they must ask
NIDA for its marijuana. It is now one year since the release of the NIH report,
and *NIDA still has not changed its unnecessarily restrictive policy.*
The policy created in 1995 by NIDA Director Alan Leshner requires all researchers
to apply for and receive a federal grant from NIH before they can receive NIDA's
marijuana -- even if they do not need federal money. If NIH refuses to approve
the study, then NIDA will not provide the marijuana.
Pharmaceutical companies do not face this extra hurdle: When they develop new
synthetic drugs, they can begin their research as soon as the FDA gives them permission
to begin their studies. NIDA's unfair double standard discourages scientists from
trying to study medicinal marijuana. Accordingly, one year ago the NIH Ad Hoc
Group of Experts recommended the following: "Whether
or not the NIH is the primary source of grant support for a proposed bona fide
clinical research study, if that study meets U.S. regulatory standards (U.S. Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) protocol approval and Drug Enforcement Administration
(DEA) controlled substances registration) the study should receive marijuana and/or
matching placebo supplied by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)." "If
a study does not require government funding, scientists should not have to waste
time applying for a grant, only to get rejected because of a lack of funds," said
MPP's Chuck Thomas. "NIDA has effectively rejected the expert group's advice."
"Tens
of thousands of seriously ill people nationwide are already risking arrest and
imprisonment by using marijuana for medicinal purposes," said Thomas. "Because
the FDA-approval route is being blocked by NIDA, the Marijuana Policy Project
is urging the American people to pass state and local laws to remove criminal
penalties for patients who possess or grow their own medicinal marijuana."
On November 3, initiatives that would allow patients to legally use medicinal
marijuana will appear on the ballots in Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, Oregon,
and Washington.
- END - |