New
Scientist Marijuana Special Report - Introduction
New
Scientist Marijuana Special ReportNew
Scientist, Feb 21, 1998Claim
THREE: "Smoking marijuana can lead to abnormal functioning of lung tissue . .
." Smoking a couple of joints is as bad for your lungs as consuming a
whole packet of cigarettes, say the anti-dope brigade. Their opponents say smoking
marijuana has never caused anyone to die from lung cancer. So, is marijuana smoke
more -- or less -- dangerous than tobacco smoke?
The person to ask is Donald Tashkin, a lung expert at the University of California
at Los Angeles. For the past 15 years, Tashkin's team has been keeping a close
eye on the respiratory systems of more than 130 regular marijuana smokers, comparing
them with groups of people who smoke either just tobacco, tobacco and marijuana,
or nothing at all. It's the biggest study of its kind in the world. And the results
so far suggest that in some respects, yes, marijuana is more dangerous than cigarettes.
But in one important respect, joints may actually be better for you -- especially
if you're an athlete.
First, the bad news. While the cigarette smokers in the study were ploughing through
20 or more a day, the marijuana smokers seldom consumed more than three or four
joints. Despite this, the marijuana smokers coughed and wheezed as much as the
cigarette smokers. In both groups, about one in five people complained of coughing
up phlegm and suffering bouts of bronchitis.
And when it came to cellular damage to the lungs, there was also little to choose
between them. Both groups had too many mucus-secreting cells lining their airways
and too few hair cells, and both groups showed evidence of abnormalities in cell
nuclei and changes in genes known to have an early role in the development of
cancers. The similarity
may seem puzzling given that the marijuana smokers were consuming so much less
plant material. But there are good reasons for it, says Tashkin. The first is
that joints yield up to three times the tar of cigarettes because they are more
loosely packed and don't have filters. The second reason is that marijuana smokers
inhale more deeply and hold their breath longer. "We
actually quantified this and found that the breath-holding time was increased
about fourfold," says Tashkin. "That resulted in about a 40 per cent greater deposition
of tar." Tashkin's final factor -- contested by some researchers -- is that marijuana
smoke is richer in benzopyrene and other polycyclic aromatics known to trigger
cancerous changes in cells.
So smoking marijuana can cause lung cancer, after all? Well, maybe. Despite the
gloomy cell biology, epidemiologists have so far failed to find a link between
marijuana and serious lung diseases. That might be because there isn't one. Or
it might be because "the marijuana epidemic" (as Tashkin calls it) is still young
and the people who started smoking in the 1960s haven't reached an age when cancers
become common. Meanwhile,
some researchers are worried about another aspect of marijuana smoke -- its ability
to interfere with immune cells that help to fight off lung infections. Tashkin's
team has just discovered that immune cells isolated from the lungs of marijuana
users are unusually bad at killing bacteria, 35 per cent worse, in fact, than
similar cells taken from cigarette smokers. The marijuana-exposed cells were also
below par at producing molecules needed to mount inflammatory responses. In normal
marijuana smokers, the effects may be too slight to make much difference. Tashkin
fears, however, that the same might not be true in people with AIDS, many of whom
use cannabis to stimulate their appetites. Footballer's
fancy There's some good news, though, for dope-smoking cricketers and
footballers: marijuana smoke won't lead to blocked airways or emphysema. Despite
all the cellular changes noted by Tashkin's team, the researchers found that even
heavy smoking of marijuana had no impact on any physical measure of lung function.
In fact, among their subjects, smoking three joints per day caused no greater
rate of decline in lung capacity and the ability to breathe than smoking no marijuana
per day. And the
reason for this silver lining? It could well be back to those sluggish immune
cells, speculates Tashkin: "If cannabis impairs the ability of immune cells to
produce inflammatory cytokines, you might be spared mucosal damage in peripheral
airways." From New
Scientist, 21 February 1998 |